In The Press...
Here you will see articles that have appeared in various publications. They will be presented as published. Some editorial comments or notes may be added in the form of footnotes to clarify, correct or challenge.
Note: The oldest articles are at the bottom of this page.
Contents
9. Cutting Down Trees Should Not Be An Issue
This letter is in response to Robert Doyle's. In the past three years, I have attended 90 percent of all Presque Isle Township Board meetings, have you?
September of 2007, I attended a Parks and Recreation meeting where the need for cutting of the trees was discussed. A year ago, the chairman of the Parks and Recreation group, Peter Pettalia addressed the township board requesting trees be cut down but "not until after the parks closed for the season". The question was asked about cost; answer, no cost. Since there was no money involved a roll call vote was not required; however, one board member said, "that's a no brainer" and every member of the board, was in agreement1. Furthermore, it has been substantiated the trees in question were not valuable but either dead or scrub. Cost of clean up to taxpayers is minimal. A group of volunteers who have worked at both lighthouses restoring and cleaning for years has taken on this project, perhaps you should join them.
Old pictures of the new lighthouse show the same clearing down to the lake. If we are concerned with historical accuracy then cutting these trees was necessary.
... End of Letter ...
1 Although parts of this exchange are not recorded in the meeting minutes, numerous audience members attest to the accuracy of this claim.
8. PI Township Supervisor Should Be Recalled
I'm writing this letter in response to the article in The Alpena News discussing the recall effort that has begun against the Presque Isle Township Supervisor, Pat Pokorski. All of the points the News covered are dwarfed by the destruction that Mr. Pokorski did by having trees cut down at both of the Presque Isle lighthouses. The cost of the cleanup is now the burden of the tax payers of Presque Isle Township. Everyone that I have talked to, finds it hard to believe that such devastation to our beautiful township parks could have happened.
I voted for Mr. Pokorski, and I now stand firmly behind the recall effort. Mr. Pokorski should have to answer for what he did in a court of law. If we taxpayers don't demand this, what's going to stop the next person from cutting down trees on township property? Mr. Pokorski was never given authorization from the Presque Isle Township board of Trustees to do what he did. The taxpayers need to set a precedent and restore democracy in Presque Isle Township.
Furthermore, Mr. Pokorski refers to the whole recall effort as "political mudslinging". I don't think that the trees that are gone had any party affiliation whatsoever. The only person that is making this a political mess is Mr. Pokorski himself. His running for the 106th district has no bearing on this at all.1
If you are still undecided about the validity of the need for a recall, take a drive to the lighthouses and see what Mr. Pokorski has done. The missing trees won't lie about the criminal act, and the voters surely don't need a criminal in charge.
... End of Letter ...
1 Come on now — anyone with even half a brain can see the political opportunism that Pokorski opponents are exercising. Do you think it is coincidence that this author chose to speak a mere week ahead of the primary election? And, what about the timing of the push for "recall signatures"? Please don't play everyone for fools.
7. Request To Recall Township Supervisor Underway
Not one, but two township supervisors in the county are being targeted for recall from office.
Voters in Bearinger Township will be asked in August if they want to remove their supervisor, while a similar effort is just getting off the grounf in Presque Isle Township.
Barry Schatz filed wording with the county clerk office to collect petition signatures to remove supervisor Patrick Pokorski from his post.
The proposed wording for the petitions was submitted June 18, said clerk Sue Rhode. She was required to schedule the hearing within the 10th and 20th day of receiving the request.
A clarity hearing was conducted Wednesday afternoon (past press time) by the election commission which includes probate judge Donald McLennan, treasurer Beth Heinzel and Rhode.
Shatz cites several reasons for the recall effort, and include:
- Removed acres of trees at the lighthouse parks without approval from the township board. No contract with contractors that did the work.
- Committed DEQ (Department of Environmental Quality) and other violations by not getting permits.
- Cost for cleanup, repair and restoration will exceed $5,000, including $2,000 to remove stumps and brush from wetlands. Additional trees were cut from private property adjacent to the township cemetery without the owner's final approval
- Exceeded 2009-10 budget
- Budget not prepared for the May 2010 meeting, so trustees could examine it prior to approval. A special meeting was called at taxpayer's expense.
- As township sexton, exceeded his budget.
- Has behaved unprofessional at township meetings, has been argumentative and raised his voice to attendees, blames others for his errors and decisions. In general has failed to provide leadership and management for the township. Does not communicate with board members, committee members or staff.
The hearing will be conducted to determine if the language is understandable to voters, not if the allegations are true.
If the petitions can be solicitated, sponsors will need the signatures of 239 registered voters within 90 days. The number is based on 25 percent of the voters who took part in the last race for governor (supervisor).
Schatz facilitates the blog "My Presque Isle" where he states a "criminal investigation has begun." Pokorski is a candidate for the 106th District of the State House of Representatives.
"This is purely political," said Pokorski, who believes opponents are trying to derail his state house bid. "I've always acted in the best interests of the people of Presque Isle Township."
6. Pokorski Faces Recall Effort
Vows to fight, stay in 106th race; petition organizer not present at hearing
Presque Isle Township Supervisor Patrick Pokorski, who also is a candidate for the 106th State House, vowed to continue to fight through a local recall effort that has sparked a large public display of support. Even though he could be removed from his post locally, he still intends to follow through on his quest to serve in Lansing.
On Wednesday a clarity review hearing for a recall petition took place in Rogers City. The Presque Isle County Election Commission determined the language in the recall petition was acceptable and 239 signatures from registered voters from the district are needed to put the issue on the November ballot.
Thirty-one supporters showed up to defend Pokorski, and they attempted to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the petition's claims. Probate Court Don McLennan said the hearing was not about finding guilt or innocence but to determine if the claims are easily understood for Pokorski to respond.
"This isn't to determine if an allegation is true or false, but to make sure the language is clear so the accused can make a defense," McLennan said. "Government can't get in the way of the people for this. The only thing it is used for is to allow it to go through if it can enable defense."
The complaint was filed by Barry Schatz of Grand Lake, who wasn't at the proceeding. Schatz listed seven reasons for the recall, including accusations about over spending budget money, unprofessional behavior and failing to provide leadership and management to the township.
Commission members had concerns that more than a few of the claims were vague in description and their clarity. County Treasurer Beth Heinzel said because there is a limit on how many words can be used on the document, it is often hard for the filer to include a lot of detail.
"When you are limited to 200 words and you have seven reasons on the petition you're almost forced to be a little more general," Heinzel said. "Overall I think it was pretty well written considering the restrictions. I think the voters will be able to understand it, but it is important to remember that we were not here to decide if what he allegedly did was right or wrong or if he did anything at all. That will be left up to the voters to decide."
McLennan said it is very important to educate the voters about the ballot language and to make them aware that the hearing was only to determine if the wording is clear. He said some things on the petition may not be accurate, but that in the case of a recall it is up to the voters to decide what is fact and what is fiction.
Pokorski said he appreciates the support he has gotten from his supporters and it is because of them he is going to move forward and serve them the way he always has.
"I have always done everything with input and with the best intent and it shows by the amount of people who showed up today to support me," Pokorski said. "They took time out of their day to be here because they care. I'm going to continue to do my job for all the residents, not just the ones that are supporting me now."
He said other candidates for the 106th have been using the possible recall to garner support for themselves. Pokorski said he has no intent of backing away from running in the primary in August. He said the mudslinging needs to stop and that each party must take a close look in the mirror, because both the Republicans and the Democrats have been making mistakes.
"My opponents are using this against me for the 106th seat, but I will continue to campaign because I feel I can serve the people in the district as well as I have the people of Presque Isle Township. This recall is purely political driven." Pokorski said. "I am running as a Democrat, but both sides are guilty of making poor choices. All the bickering and grandstanding needs to stop. I am going to continue to fight for what my constituents and I believe is right."
Steve Schulwitz can be reached via e-mail at sschulwitz@thealpenanews.com or by phone at 358-5689.
View newspaper article and readers' comments
5. Economic Progress Hurts Enjoyment Of Parks
It seems that our parks have moved away now belonging to some other presence down-state.
New Lighthouse Museum 1905 Cedar Climbing Tree (right next to the road) — Lower branches just high enough to raise the grandkids. Room for a small family once you get up there.
Road Around Lighthouse — Armored by evergreens on both sides of the road, crowning out the sun, adding to lighthouse's inscrutability.
Old Lighthouse Museum 1870 Very Unique Location— Sitting on the heel of the peninsula, jutting out into Lake Huron, ancient cedar trees, limited adjacent parking, with the lighthouse museum, its history, and cedar foot trail along the beach from the break wall of the marina adding to its beauty by creating a very special, historical entirety.
Sorry Presque Isle Township. Trees have been removed — for wider roads, more parking, and tour bus drivers. It's always been true, "You don't know what you've got till it's gone."
Whither-or-not the presence from down-state prefers such a diminished experience will soon be seen. I enjoyed sharing my parks with others, but now this has become a controlling factor. My heart is forever saddened even if it becomes economically successful.
4. Presque Isle Has Best Neighbors In The World
After spending my entire life in Detroit and the surrounding area, I retired, and with a little reluctance, moved to the more rural area of Presque Isle at the coaching of my wife. I have now resided in the area for almost four years, and would be hard pressed to find a better place to live. Recently I was severely injured in an accident at my home. Until now, I have never known that such a neighborly compassion existed. It may sound like an old cliche, but my wife Betsy and I cannot begin to thank all of my new neighbors and friends for their visits, gifts, and support. So to all of you, we can but offer an eternal gift of friendship. We sincerely hope that we will live up to the task. And to anyone who travels 20 miles north of Alpena, when you see a sign that reads " Blue Horizon Drive," take note that you are among the best neighbors in the world.
Vic Mastrogiovanni, Presque Isle
Editorial Comment:
One of the greatest resources that our township has — friends.
3. Presque Isle Township Supervisor Goes Too Far
Supervisor Pat Pokorsky gave his approval to clear acres of trees from township property without the board's approval. He finally admitted to doing so after skirting several requests from Board members and citizens during public comment at the November meeting.
Numerous citizens attended to oppose the reckless clearing, unhappy with changes and questioned clearing at the Township cemetery.
Although he repeatedly tried to fault the Parks and Recreation Committee for the approving the clearing,1 committee members denied involvement. Board members and the public voiced their concerns at the bold move to clear township property without their knowledge2 and proper planning. Members of the audience said they were "sickened" by the devestation. An admission of fault and an apology would have been appropriate.
Pokorsky called a special meeting without notice on Nov. 2 to obtain approval to buy gravel and clear stumpage to complete construction on the new "parking" areas that he had cleared. Surprised board members refused to give approval until the citizens were given a chance for public input.
Unfortunately, an unsightly mess and ugly landscape is left for the taxpayers to clean up.
Pokorsky believes he did nothing wrong.
Board members learned without their knowledge, Pokorsky approached the Harbor Association to request clearing at the cemetery for parking.3 Pokorsky claims 20 years experience in local government, yet permits for parking lots must be obtained and planned according to local ordinance.
Records show that Pokorsky charged the township $900 for attending a seminar in August on "Hiring and Retaining Fireman." The township does not hire nor manage fire departments within the township.4 Apparently, Mr. Pokorsky needs supervision.
Trustee Lynn Morison, Treasurer Bette Tadajewski and clerk Karen Fournier should be commended for standing up for the citizens.5
Editorial Comments:
1The Parks and Recreation report to Council on the August 10, 2009 stated that the New Lighthouse tree clearing was to be done "this fall" after the park closed.
2At the Arts and Crafts Show and the Township sponsored Labor Day Picnic held at the New Lighthouse in the summer of 2009, there was open discussion amongst those present regarding the planned clearing of the 3-4 acres south of the 1905 House. Also, see previous footnote. People should not have been surprised.
3There was never a parking lot proposed for the cemetery — only a short access drive.
4The budget for local fire protection is about $290,000 annually and must be approved by the Township Board of Trustees. The township and fire department ARE linked. The fire department has encountered difficulty in recruiting sufficient personnel to assure an adequate response level. Our supervisor wishes to be proactive in this matter.
5What about Trustee Paavola? Is she also a black sheep? Perhaps she judges things on their merit and ignores the forces that attempt to control council.
2. Guidelines Needed For Township Supervisor
The people of Presque Isle Township acquired a new Supervisor during the election of 2008, that choice was Patrick Pokorski. As the supervisor, he is the manager of the township assets, supervisor of township employees, and chairman of the township board. There is also a statute limiting him, and other board members, from independently representing the township without board approval.
Although there is not a specific competetive bidding process currently required, a manager of a public entity should have the wherewithall to ensure that he is providing the best possible services at the best possible cost. Without competitive bids, without proper preplanning, without complete project assessment, without proper documentation, no one within this township has any assurance that our assets are being utilized properly.
Two recent examples of unsuccessful actions are: 1) the grading and seeding of the new cemetery section. More than 50% over budget and no documentation.1 2) Removal of trees for parking and access at the lighthouse parks and cemetery. No board approval, no competetive bids, and no documented scope defined. It was not managed as a project but rather as a one step at a time sequence: give away the trees,2 then request money to clean up the mess.
I'm sure that there are some things associated with managing the township that Pat Pokorski is good at, but based on the overcapacity public turnout3 at the Nov. 9, 2009 board meeting, and the disassociation shown by most of the board members at that meeting, managing our township dollars and maintaining a cohesive board of directors are not on his qualification record.
The Planning Commission is taking action this winter to develop a 5 year capital plan along with specific guidelines for assessing and obtaining project approval and guidelines for obtaining competetive quotations.
Editorial Comments:
1The cemetery expansion was commenced several years ago by previous council with Peter Pettalia as Township Supervisor and Sexton. The shortcomings of that project should fall on his shoulders. Patrick simply took over a stalled project and got the wheels moving again.
2Trees were not "given away". They were exchanged for the labor costs for removing them. With the highly depressed current economical situation, the township most likely won big on the trade.
3The large crowd was the result of the recruiting efforts of the particular interest group that selectively mailed out the "Concerned Citizens" letter and invited the press to the meeting.
1. Removal of Lighthouse Park Trees Scrutinized
Patrick Pokorski, Presque isle Township Supervisor 
|
Some citizens of Presque Isle Township voiced their concerns about the clearing of trees at the lighthouse parks and township cemetery and had several questions at Monday's meeting, especially for supervisor Patrick Pokorski. According to a one-page letter, which arrived in the mailboxes of many township residents Monday, it is estimated that four to five acres of trees have been cleared at New Presque Isle Lighthouse from the 1905 keeper's house to the lake,1 while "the swath of trees cut at the Old Lighthouse Park is about 1 1/2acres."
The access roads to the Old Lighthouse has been widened after complaints have been received that buses and motor homes have been scraping against branches and the parking area at Old Presque Isle Lighthouse is too far for elderly visitors. The cemetery clearing was to improve access as well, as some people were driving over graves.
The letter, sent out by "concerned citizens," alleged Pokorski arranged with R & R Tree Company of Posen to remove the trees without board approval, with compensation to the contractor coming from the harvesting of the resources. "We believe, all residents should be concerned about the deliberate circumventing of the legislative process," stated the letter.
Additionally, the project appears to have violated the township's greenbelt ordinance with the amount of trees cleared to the lake, said zoning administrator Linda Taylor. TRUSTEE Lynn Morrison said there was no protocol followed on this project. "Those are valuable assets to the township. I understand we talked about it, but there was no motion. I never ok'd that to happen. I had no vote, no say in the cutting of these trees." Pokorski said there had been discussion at the parks and recreation commission (P & RC) about clearing the trees at New Presque Isle Park.
"In my mind, I thought we had full go ahead," said Pokorski after the meeting. He said P & RC member Clayton Peters was under the same impression. Pokorki was disappointed a letter was sent out instead of people coming to him to get the facts. "When we started cutting some of that, we found a lot of dead trees, so we took out the dead trees," said Pokorski. "Come to me and talk to me. I'll explain to you how we got to where we're at. When we've got dead trees that are going to fall down and we have to get volunteers to get them up. This guy is here, let him take out these trees." P & RC CHAIRMAN Peter Pettalia said, "the New Lighthouse most certainly would have been approved, but no motion was made,2 " for a recommendation. "There was never any discussion about the Old Lighthouse," added Pettalia.
Pokorski, who was elected to the supervisor's job a year ago, has been involved in township government for nearly two decades, serving on the planning commission and zoning board of appeals, before winning election in 2008. Clerk Karen Fournier referred to township attorney Jim Florip when asking for a clarification if protocol was indeed followed when Pokorski made the decision without the board's approval. Florip said, "whatever the township does, the board authorizes it and acts on it. And that's the way it has been for 150 years ... the business of the township is conducted by the board."
"I am 100 percent behind coming to the board to make a decision," said Pokorski. "I had talked to board members and had brought it up at a previous meeting. "Earlier in the meeting, during the citizen comment period, Judy Kimball said she was "devastated" and almost brought to tears when she saw how much had been cleared. Mary Ellen Parker said, "One of the things that is attractive about this area is that it is still in its natural state. Man hasn't tried to improve it, and thereby made it worse, until I saw what I saw today. I don't think our natural beauty has been protected. If someone wants to see the lake from the New Lighthouse, let them walk."
Pokorski said the clearing at the cemetery was more than it should have been. "If people are upset, man I apologize for them being upset. Do I think I think it's the right thing for safety and for the betterment of the lighthouses? Yes." Morrison said the mess now needs to be cleaned up.
During further discussion about what the next step should be, and possibly scheduling a site visit, Taylor said the board has violated their greenbelt ordinance. "When there is clearing adjacent to any waterfront in the township, we do require that 60 percent of the indigenous vegetation remain, and we need to take that under consideration," said Taylor. Fournier said more information would need to be gathered before moving forward, "Because now what has been done there is against our own ordinances."
Editorial Comments:
1This area was historically clear as documented in photos displayed in the lighthouse museum. Failure to maintain this area over the years allowed it to become overgrown.
2The Parks and Recreation report to Council on the August 10, 2009 stated that the New Lighthouse tree clearing was to be done "this fall" after the park closed. With that timeline being only 2 months away, should a formal request for council approval not have been made at that time — unless all parties believed that it was okay to proceed?
A successful person is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks that others throw at him.
... DAVID BRINKLEY
